The U.S.A. don't come into it at all.
Jafamere Govt. Cara represented Send.) concurred; this Dutch Govt. think that their Consul.
I shot. mot thank and amill suguhal that in the likely to object, be well to froint aut Bad & the 'Chinese Prince t ETD.
de. Goods so detained who to U.S. Conti. lout that 20/212/760 released, mot the legality of their detention, God made strong H.M.G. considered it increfractient the frement came, wh, was from any doubt because the refresentation o to resist of shipment from Jabour to the Dutch & Indian, the Jefamere C.G. concurred in the detentionn there is no evidence that the Dutch Govt. hod absolutely contain Loods Lumb refresentations unless it is mucgent wat there either of those Gouty make t the detention of frotested and Ilegal, comberate that to that effect.
Cus need to alcune 27/0/16 It is pretty evident that 7.7.0 have net seen the T.K. andincenes. ordre 221965 is to be read with ordre 12/1905, S. 1(2) of which defines "enemy" as including meaning "any person or body of persons who would be to treated for the purpose of any Procland. issued the dealing with I. with the E. for ther Fine being in force." Having regard 552 to this No the exponen a little provision in S. 11. 07 2017/1505 for procedings before a ma gistrate, it is difficult to see how we that the forfeilun can agree was unauthorized ? send copies of АК andres 257.giz, 12/1905 22/1945, pointing above, savvy out a that there wired in the lins seem very little chance of getting the forfeiture set ande bey the Count & Suggesting that theme would appear Bhe 40 question of paying are Compensation clain in Received from the Dutch for!
In the circumstance, it seems unnecendo to go rinko Min
is not a very urgent or
The U.S.A. don't come
important
into it at all
Jafamere Gout. Cara refresented
Send.) concurred;
this Dutch Goot. think that
it
teme
j
their Consul.
I shot.
mot
thank
and
amill
suguhal
that in the
likely to object,
be well to froint
aut
Bad & the 'Chinese Prince
t ETD.
de.
Goods
so detained
who to
U.S. Conti.
lout
that
20/212/760
released,
mot
the legality of their detention,
God made strong H.M.G. considered it increfractient
the frement came,
wh, was
!
from any doubt
because the
refrenentation o
to resist
of shipment from Jabour to the Dutch & Indian, the Jefamere C.G. concurred
in the detentionn
there is no evidence that the Dutch Govt. hod
absolutely contain
Loods
Lumb
refresentations
unless it is
mucgent wat
there
either of those Gouty make t
the detention of
frotested
ف
and
Ilegal,
comberate
that
→
to that effect.
Cus
need
to alcune
27/0/16
It is pretty evident that 7.7.0
have net
seen the T.K. andincenes. ordre 221965 is to be read with ordre 12/1905, S. 1(2) of which defines "enemy" as including meaning "any person or body of persons who would be to treated for the purpose of any Procland. issued the dealing with I. with the E. for
ther Fine
being in force." Having regard
552
to this No the exponen
a
little
provision in S. 11. 07 2017/1505 for procedings before a ma gistrate, it is difficult to see how we
that the forfeilun
can agree
was unauthorized
? send copies of
АК
andres 257.giz, 12/1905 22/1945, pointing
above, savvy
out
a
that there wired in the lins seem very little chance of getting the forfeiture set ande bey the Count & Suggesting that theme would appear
Bhe 40
question of paying are Compensation
clain in
Received from the Dutch for!
In the circumstance, it seems unnecendo to go rinko Min
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.